> But in terms of being willing to make changes to the GnuPG option space > that break backward compatibility for some users in order to improve the > overall state of GnuPG crypto, removing --enable-large-rsa isn't > anywhere *close* to the top of my list.
It's fine if it's not at the top of the list; but is there any compelling reason to not put it on the list?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
