-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 21 June 2017 at 7:49:42 PM, in <mid:ffb9b23c-b01b-44d0-3a75-6e5e474de...@digitalbrains.com>, Peter Lebbing wrote:- > I think it's a bad UX choice to > name an invalid > signature "UNTRUSTED Good" and a valid signature > "Good". I think it > suggests they both have some credibility, which is a > false suggestion. I thought "good signature" just meant the message has not been altered in transit. - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEARYKAH0WIQQzrO1O6RNO695qhQYXErxGGvd45AUCWUxpyF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNB Q0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcxMkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd4 5HqLAP9+B3S80DDB9qpejz6V+MsFUOKZsUmNsRSLp8B8CNoenAEAsQn5DpDH0HSP AE0qqxmrA988lDiWQsMoHHXL6cUSCQuJAZMEAQEKAH0WIQSzrn7KmoyLMCaloPVr fHTOsx8l8AUCWUxp2F8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0QjNBRTdFQ0E5QThDOEIzMDI2QTVBMEY1NkI3 Qzc0Q0VCMzFGMjVGMAAKCRBrfHTOsx8l8A/FB/sFVMYxnxp7eUhnXkRy1SKrdL2t k74kp8a1Qg800q9acoa33HyaD4oz/W1XAN3e//rAH8DQYiiUSBHFlagyolI+5Hbs invOu6VdGm8MNL7KDV7Qg7AtbqGd451Gyo8QzoDX6FpIY421E2iIq2xi+kZ/co4M kO7oMJ57dy+RAr80k/my9StSIHvXlzwQ0fhY6/x96Pa0BWA5dfq6zUYcywejK8R2 VmDeN+sQ2Q3dcrixmZm76L743q1zx+5YV+oceGhv+O8LfWzGpGBMamo2+vCRtzDV Gz8ZHpXKk5VUIAi3DOosVTfS6ZEx6I6o2dPcP2zAnVqGJ8MPEffRLKkC+C16 =7Vky -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
