Appreciate the feedback but I have indeed reread the RFC specification
quite thoroughly and still can't seem to figure out the issue. Don't mean
to spam the mailing list but is there any chance someone might have a bit
more insight into this. Quite stumped!
Thanks,
Paul Taukatch
Advanced Technologies Team / zOS Cloud Crypto
From: Kristian Fiskerstrand
<kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com>
To: Paul Taukatch/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: 04/21/2017 06:29 AM
Subject: Re: GPG Signature Verification
On 04/21/2017 09:16 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 09:17 PM, Paul Taukatch wrote:
>> I've attached my public key and debug log but please let me know if
there
>> is any other information that might be helpful.
>
> The first reference that springs to mind is [RFC4880] Section 5.2.4.
> Computing Signatures
Of course you already mentioned this in your initial email :) Looks
correct to me.
--
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
"If your kids are giving you a headache, follow the directions on the
aspirin bottle, especially the part that says "keep away from children."
(Neil McElroy)
[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Paul Taukatch/Poughkeepsie/IBM]
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
