On 03/04/17 15:30, Doug Barton wrote: > We really need to stop referring to this as signing.
I agree. But it might be too late. I used it as a means of explaining what I meant with "Certify capability". Next time I'll somehow work into my formulation that this should be called certification, not signing. Similar issues: certificate vs (public) key ownertrust, trust and validity I'm inclined to give up on the latter now we have TOFU. Your speech would become truly idiosyncratic if you were to introduce Validity On First Use in it... Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
