Hi Daniel, On Wednesday, 22 February 2017 15:50:21 CET Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2017-02-22 10:10:51 -0500, Thomas Jarosch wrote: > > I've tried paperkey with Gnupg 2.1.13 and it had trouble parsing the > > secret > > key data. May be the internal packet format changed or needs adaption. > > Can you replicate this problem with a dummy/throwaway key? If so, can > you report this problem explicitly please? I don't know how David Shaw > wants bug reports upstream, but sending mail to the debian BTS would > also be fine. If you do that, you'd mail to "sub...@bugs.debian.org" > with a reasonable subject about what's going wrong, and the first two > lines of your mail would be something like:
In the interest of humanity and the cause of science, I've just tried again with a throwaway key :) This time it worked just fine. The "only" thing that's changed is that I've upgraded from Fedora 22 to Fedora 25 since I last tried. Let's consider this matter solved. Cheers, Thomas _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
