Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Mon 2017-02-13 11:54:04 -0500, Lukas Pitschl | GPGTools wrote: >>> Am 13.02.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net>: >>> >>> On Mon 2017-02-13 06:41:51 -0500, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: >>>> Step two: Encrypt using gpg --throw-keyids. >>>> >>>> This is easy on the sender's end, but whether this feature can be >>>> used as a matter of course depends on how it impacts the >>>> experience of the recipient. >>> >>> It's almost like decryption of messages with hidden keyids and >>> per-decryption passphrase prompting (or even confirmation) are mutually >>> incompatible workflows :/ >> >> Just thinking out loud here, but wouldn’t it be sensible for gnupg to have a >> „silent“ option, >> that only try keys for which a passphrase is cached in gpg-agent? > > how about "--try-cached-secrets", by analogy with --try-all-secrets or > --try-secret-key? > > I like this idea.
I don't. I strongly believe that adding command line switches should be the absolute last resort. Justus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
