> The main problem would be its 64-bit block size. Apparently there's a > "practical" attack against 64-bit ciphers as used in TLS [1].
Quoting from the abstract: "In our proof-of-concept demos, the attacker needs to capture about 785GB of data." I question the wisdom of any system which sends 785Gb of data without ever rekeying. This attack seems to fall into the realm of "stupid SSL mistakes lead to exploitation. " _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
