On 170118-22:59+1030, Lachlan Gunn wrote: > Le 2017-01-18 à 22:48, Miroslav Rovis a écrit : > > On 170115-22:17+0100, Juan Miguel Navarro Martínez wrote: > > ... > >> Lastly, revoke the old one if you aren't going to use it publicly anymore. > > Isn't is wrong to revoke a key which you don't consider was compromised? > > If you don't want to use it, it suffices that it is expired, or? > > No, compromise is only one reason---there are lots of reason-codes that > can go into the revocation packet, and compromise is only one. > Specificially, "superseded" is such a reason. > > Otherwise, if you switch to a new key, people won't know that your old > one is no longer in use. > > Thanks, > Lachlan
Thank *you*! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
