-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Friday 2 December 2016 at 1:46:00 PM, in <mid:96a4d163-02fb-096e-a75e-980f0ee61...@mailbox.org>, Stephan Beck wrote:- > gpg's signature timestamp (on a given file) would NOT > be a real proof of > a document being allegedly signed at that specific > date or (prior to a > determined date). Maybe use a digital timestamping service, such as <http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper/stampinf.htm>? Or publish an encrypted (or not) copy in the small ads of a newspaper. - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> An idealist is a person who helps other people to be prosperous -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iL4EARYKAGYFAlhCy71fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDMzQUNFRDRFRTkxMzRFRUJERTZBODUwNjE3 MTJCQzQ2MUFGNzc4RTQACgkQFxK8Rhr3eOSHtQEA8/8Lrit4l+I1qgxnCWSov6ai dF/2/9n31AmG4/0k5HsA/30W1f52Ae3Dmx6B5Gt0DYIXgLDTit8mISD2GvFvHdgN iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJYQsvOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwNlYIALPOm8l1bgXq1Gn9nuXahN+m oTKHJMegDoGsYhjDou8YSHHPj998evdAAhsg6yeZwNmq37FRYIyrqx2aMsmQy6qx lKMyCA0OFDgetFfKS/C/jGkkY0YyZvv5z8mecokmnc82C5T3HpfmzGAazheh+Nm0 SHAp34rkTUL+8zukKbTpnMXhFItlrflThEc4ZoLIj+df7XD3ajWuMgwnf1vEgQY+ CRHCurgWYkVSAEuyqf7ehKhumCfawELbGmfYWQXWpiUfQ9rbRigRQ+OkG/Aw5Ggo w2HjJI23aAy9ZZRm8T01KYQXR7+0Uy9hyzU+dS1lTZfETtHFdsbHPYqKSyfgzm8= =7mgK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
