Can you tell from the context which library is missing? --Scott
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:19 AM, James King <james.k...@thegeekgroup.org> wrote: > ./configure run in the gnupg-2.0.30 directory returns 'required libraries > not found', i.e, the GNU portable threads library, which I've downloaded > from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pth/ unpacked, and installed > > ./configure > make > sudo make install > > Aside from "make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'." > > Everything appears normal, except ./configure for gnu PG will continue to > return "library missing" > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 05:48, james.k...@thegeekgroup.org said: >> > ./configure runs fine >> >> The configure run creates the Makefile(s), look at the output: >> >> [...] >> configure: creating ./config.status >> config.status: creating m4/Makefile >> config.status: creating Makefile >> [...] >> >> Do you see thse lines or did configure terminate with an error message? >> >> > directory contains "Makefile.am" if I rename to Makefile, and run make >> >> You can't do that; Makefile.am and Makefile.in are templates ffrom which >> a Makefile is created by configure. >> >> >> Salam-Shalom, >> >> Werner >> >> -- >> Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. >> /* Join us at OpenPGP.conf <https://openpgp-conf.org> */ >> >> > > > -- > James King -- > > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact > the sender and delete all copies. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > > -- Eat like you give a damn. Go vegan.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
