On 01/08/16 17:54, whi...@mixnym.net wrote: > I see that there are three versions of GnuPG available. Assuming no hardware > constraints, is there any reason to choose Classic 1.4 or Stable 2.0 instead > of Modern 2.1? It appears to do everything the others can and more.
I think usually the constraints are software constraints. But 1.4 might be more appropriate in for instance a headless server. I suppose that counts as a hardware constraint indeed :-). I'd say, go for 2.1. I think 2.0 is more for people who wish to stick to 2.0 for whatever reason. If you don't have any particular motivation to use 2.0 or 1.4, you should go for 2.1. HTH, Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
