Hi, I'm one of the developers involved in Guix.
While doing the update of gnupg from 2.1.13 to 2.1.14 I found out that you now include a modified version of tinyscheme for running your tests/opengpg/ tests. Are the changes you apply to tinyscheme generic enough to contribute to upstream, so that we can just include a modified tinyscheme software to run tests/opengpg/ tests during the check phase of GnuPG? If they aren't, could you move the gpgscm binary outside of the source of gnupg to not include bundled dependencies, or in some more convinient way for you? As there seems to be no general developer list for GnuPG I'll use this list, we can move the discussion elsewhere if it does not fit in here. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org SecuShare – http://secushare.org _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
