Hello Bernhard, > I like the idea, I'll probably try it once I have a need for > the use case. Maybe you can add a link to your tool to > wiki.gnupg.org?
Sure, if that's OK for a still somewhat experimental stage. > Did you consider pyme or > pygpgme? (See https://wiki.gnupg.org/APIs ) I did search for current gnupg Python bindings and thought that there ought to be a in-process solution, but have to confess that until three days ago, I wasn't even aware that both exist. > For a new application (which is not a module) I would directly > go to python3 and gpg2 only in order to easy future > maintenance. I started out with python2 because, having used it mainly for scientific computing, I am still more comfortable doing experimental stuff with it. But I agree for the long term and libraries being available, python3 is better. Johannes
pgpI4PMj1PW5c.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
