On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > > In this case, "gpgme-tool" should be packaged on its own, not inside the > > package "*libgpgme11-dev*". > > I am refering to this message: > > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2014-December/029206.html > > I'm entirely open to packaging gpgme-tool separately from the -dev > package, if there is a clear and compelling argument for it. >
If I write a tool that uses and depends on `gpgme-tool`, it doesn't seem right to me to depend on a -dev package. This is just a feeling, maybe I am wrong.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
