Hi,

I’ve implemented initial support for AES-GCM in OpenPGP.js using the IETF draft 
for authenticated encryption:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ford-openpgp-format-00

I’ve created a pull request on GitHub for the implementation. The specification 
leaves quite a bit of wiggle room and I’ve listed my thoughts here: 

https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/pull/430

I’ve already contacted the specification author to give feedback, but being the 
most widely adopted OpenPGP implementation out there, I also wanted to get the 
GnuPG community's thoughts. Making GCM the new standard mode for symmetric 
encryption would give us a modern and performant alternative to OpenPGP's CFB 
mode. Especially with regards to the WebCrypto api, where GCM is natively 
supported, but not CFB (currently marked as a 'WontFix' in the chromium bug 
tracker):

https://www.chromium.org/blink/webcrypto#TOC-Supported-algorithms-as-of-Chrome-46-

Together will ECC asymmetric encryption, GCM should give OpenPGP a modern 
cipher suite supported natively in browsers. This will hopefully also allow the 
community to deprecate some older crypto down the road. Looking forward to your 
feedback.

Thanks,
Tankred


P.S. Just for reference, here are the GitHub issues tracking ECC in OpenPGP.js. 
We have not started implementing them, but the plan is to move ahead after GCM 
is merged:

https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/issues/427
https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/issues/428
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to