On 24/02/16 22:10, Lachlan Gunn wrote: > I mean in the sense that it's a lot easier for someone doing MITM to > transparently rewrite the signatures in an email than it is to > transparently detect that you are reading the verification code and then > replace it with a synthesised version without breaking the flow of > speech. It's not perfect, but it's a barrier at least.
Ah! Then it makes sense. I hadn't picked up on that. Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
