By a weird freak of coincidence I am currently writing some code to simulate this type of experiment.
It doesn't break relativity, rather (roughly speaking) it shows that quantum measurements cannot be predetermined unless you have FTL or some kind of non-local theory that predetermines the random numbers that you are going to take. There are various potential flaws in this type experiment that might let you have your cake---relativity---and eat it too---no quantum randomness. These experiments have been done for many decades, and over time they have chipped away at the various flaws, requiring any hidden-variable theory to become increasingly perverse. This one claims to be completely free of such issues. But I'm not the greatest expert in this, so don't try to read too much into what I just said. Thanks, Lachlan Le 2016-02-23 14:44, Peter Lebbing a écrit : > On 23/02/16 14:23, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> If we're able to transmit information FTL then relativity is wrong wrong >> *wrong*. > > I went by recollection of a news item, which even if I could find it was > probably in Dutch. But I think this is what I meant: > > http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-spookiness-passes-toughest-test-yet-1.18255?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05949 > > HTH, > > Peter. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
