> This is sort of what I'd gathered from the brief reading I've done > about the situation. I'm sure there's a lot of research going on in > the area and I certainly hope "we beat them to it".
If I remember correctly, we definitely already have -- a while ago I saw some paper claiming to be a proof that McEliece was NP-HARD. If that's true, I'm willing to say McEliece is QC-immune, because a QC attack on an NP-HARD problem is currently pretty much unimaginable. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
