At Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:32:07 +0000, MFPA wrote: > On Friday 30 October 2015 at 11:51:27 AM, in > <mid:871tcc8thc.wl-n...@walfield.org>, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > > > > Sure. But your point is a red herring. There is > > *currently* no way to do this. However, the next > > version of the OpenPGP spec should have a way to do > > this. > > My point was "there is already a way to do this: use signature > notations". Is that a red herring?
It's not standardized. Sure, GnuPG could use a particular notation for this purpose, but we want to interoperability, which is why this should be standardized in RFC 4880bis. Neal _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
