-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 07/29/2015 01:07 PM, n...@enigmail.net wrote: > Hmmm,
> There should simply be no overhead in using OpenPGP in the ordinary > case for the ordinary user. > Any secure system needs proper operational security surrounding it, that require user awareness. So if security/privacy is a priority, there needs to be an overhead (it might even serve a purpose as it reminds the user about the the proper procedures to follow). Quick example; They can use OpenPGP all they want, doesn't help one bit if the private keys are stored on the computer, running a 10 year old version of Operating System XY with so many trojan horses working on copying the private key data that they are fighting over the resources on the computer. To paraphrase Schneier, security isn't a product it is a process. - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk - ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 - ---------------------------- "Action is the foundational key to all success" (Pablo Picasso) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVuLWrAAoJECULev7WN52FabcH/3NYi5yWdKNZgAmee/gFy6cB GNVYn1xxK/JI6X0/rJ58OfCbAvzxmDzpM6/FCZJ61uPFFi3UCchqkupaHKdOfkqj qVsPtavL3jeq4h/2ZXxajHiGFATGZyyO2GMQtB+TzXLwbFijErxrpE9vswBri+HH rrNRtxZM1rE7LpI0frGCS99wbcv8en0BVG6zafkKq2hA9JNDSzjnxCkqqNcRXDZL wWhCrdzobdaoxE+TPN8v7IXLdgPeLa4J9MwvT15RiS4lE07bmFuYgmtSWBWJGZQo ph8mBlii1myCedVe4oTzO5Uu2U3lO7fKi91dXz2/8GGU07TqEWTZLd7TLt6wCGA= =loYp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
