On 31/03/15 23:33, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > This doesn't appear to have been updated upstream yet, but i agree with > Peter Lebbing's suggestion here. Would presenting the patch in some > other way (e.g in git format-patch style?) be helpful?
After reading some docs and fiddling with stuff; is this okay? -- >8 -- Subject: [PATCH] 2.1 FAQ: keyring conversion: add import-local-sigs --- web/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.org | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/web/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.org b/web/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.org index bc312da..1056dd0 100644 --- a/web/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.org +++ b/web/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.org @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ then run import, and finally restore the ownertrust values: $ cd ~/.gnupg $ gpg --export-ownertrust >otrust.lst $ mv pubring.gpg publickeys -$ gpg2 --import publickeys +$ gpg2 --import-options import-local-sigs --import publickeys $ gpg2 --import-ownertrust otrust.lst #+end_example -- 2.1.4 -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
