-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 12 February 2015 at 10:46:33 PM, in <mid:m0vbj6n3xy....@kcals.intra.maillard.im>, Xavier Maillard wrote: > in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself > what is the prefered way to sign a message: inline > (like this one) or using a MIME header ? My preference is Inline: I want everything right there in the message body where I can see it. Some people advocate PGP/MIME, which hides signatures and encrypted messages in attachments. Both standards are valid, neither is deprecated. I have seen it advised to use Inline for initial contact, and switch to MIME only after establishing the recipient can cope with it. But I can't find the reference at the moment, and I think it may be outdated advice. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net It is not necessary to have enemies if you go out of your way to make friends hate you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU3eyCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwb2kH/30Y48/dFhbHsjaJriiF1XnF D8DsBr00vfBnkmZE8u0D/OyIeSBHA6BLZEwyrcI7sS4bPEgGsJTZLQ6BV+yJSz0e cLtIUoeS0500Y4EDEEC/lb64Lqk2HFBC3pvWpQyx544TYCm/rEokuoeUAPg64Arc MV7QWaO0opXxWbqqkMJdk+Szsblp23tMjcTaPRobUcfm6qhPLjnGCxRVLtFtzXyY rUAIdb9n/1ttp+7Pby4772uhH88i6L2sANnfGJf5UkD9ub4Fe8tBUeShMQK//nwn rw4jr0WUdcp9dnyWe7/dSNWGwN3NkF8Yby9mGcujc9oMK1OsOioh5eNq9AKV07SI vgQBFgoAZgUCVN3sll8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45P6cAQAQmfXw4RTx+PVLAyMKnc2zQiBr 2kTJ+KYid7vnt+y3XQEAaWa4Z4EWqFyP7fap/WgHCFRM3eAvpFRDLE7RhvBugw8= =lQ3i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
