-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/10/2015 01:24 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 10/02/15 12:52, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> No, the signature is still valid: >>
> > Why? The key was revoked because it was superseded or has been > retired, not because it was stolen or compromised. > Unless you rely on a trusted third party to provide signature stamps, signature dates can be forged. A key revocation should result in immediate questioning of all aspects of the key, as it currently does. - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk - ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 - ---------------------------- Dura necessitas Necessity is harsh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU2fndAAoJEP7VAChXwav6LSwH/ihbdKxXt7NneEjwvSnu/HtP DJE1ihJB6z+AGe2Z8LR/YkEuvDKcxPbskmjbkVA7+7f4AX+R4pPeZBdgcpt/9SsL 06GzOeHyjkPS3tvKaJ9jHFJWXg3Vkd2++Q8+Awguh0zp+MrN/Np8b/esDsUHOLs7 qPHt0NCc7NveX8HgcS81dZkV1W6Ke1u4HijVw2TkgNuP7qRDlbTMHbrkcp96FxOq bGzVhwjHpQTEuTMnuBq1KL7hl1iATihfeMg/DtLcRXPiMvYGGSomdj9U1RcfbVCL exVNnwBkNzMXy9NGqtTzmZCXuUbtoP65oHmgz0wFzWftA/N8j2/E2yofcMoDJQQ= =F1PH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
