On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:25, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said: > I noticed when verifying signatures in the last few days that the > %g in my recent signatures is expanding to a string of zeros instead > of the fingerprint of the signing key.
Right, there was a regression. Works again; here a test using a subkey gpg: Good signature from "foo bar <f...@example.org>" [ultimate] gpg: Signature notation: signed-...@example.org=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 gpg: Signature notation: signed-...@example.org=C91D0631309FE8FD3277446BCD6A67456C563330 gpg: Signature notation: signed-...@example.org=3BCC875789C4D11CBC1A8D2794115DF018AEC210 signed-byf (%f) is all-zero because this is not key signature. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
