> You are testing a modern tool that aims to be standards-compliant > against an unmaintained, known-broken program that was out of date > before the standards were even settled. When you found an > incompatibility, you reported the problem against the modern, > standards-compliant tool.
I think that's a bit harsh: he was asking about interoperability, not reporting a bug. That said, in the main I agree with you. If someone has a real need for 2.6 or 6.5.8 interoperability and upgrading isn't an option, then sure, ask around. But otherwise, I'd prefer it if anything pre-PGP 9 or pre-GnuPG 1.2 could just be left on the ash-heap of history. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
