On Sunday, 2014-11-23 13:12:47 Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: > https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-11-21_To_PGP_MIME_Or_Not.html > > The "tl;dr" is that it might be worth dropping PGP/MIME for outgoing > encrypted mail and instead use a more ad-hoc approach which > interoperates with more mail clients. I'm also tentatively proposing an > approach to reducing the header metadata leakage (Subject, From, To, > etc. being sent in the clear).
I would care more about the arguments if you were able to re-state them while dropping references to legacy email clients. I don't think new mail clients have an obligation to be backwards compatible. If you, and others, think the PGP/MIME RFC is incomplete or invalid, then that's a conversation I want to hear. Samir -- Samir Nassar sa...@samirnassar.com https://samirnassar.com PGP Fingerprint: EE76 B39E 0778 8F95 F796 B044 FE67 9A90 8E99 7AB2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
