>> ClawsMail, Thunderbird, etc. > > People usually don't want to change mail clients. Most have no idea > how to configure crypto or manage keys.
They’re just the default and almost more used MUA. If you exclude proprietary software and SaaSS (webmail). But asking for privacy using proprietary services is a fallacy. I mean, you can’t say “PGP/GNUnet/other-crypto-implementation is useless to protect users, they use webmails” and say we fix the problem wrong. Because there is *no way* they can get true privacy with only a webmail. It would be ridiculous. When I said “deserve”, I said that you can’t expect freedom when you’re putting on you your strings yourself. PS: sorry for the two mails, I got confused.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
