Most of the technical reasons can be bypassed by making a single subscriber key (public and private) available as a part of the subscription process, but that eliminates most of the technical advantages of encryption, so it's really a moot point. On Nov 17, 2014 8:52 AM, "Matthias Mansfeld" < m.mansf...@mansfeld-elektronik.de> wrote:
> Zitat von Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org>: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:33, n...@goodcrypto.com said: >> >> GoodCrypto warning: Anyone could have read this message. Use encryption, >>> it works. >>> >> >> That does not make any sense on a public mailling list. We write here >> for the public - it is non-encrypted for a purpose. >> >> scnr, >> > > ... Er, this is Nan's Signature for everything. Maybe he shoud ad the > usual -- above. > > But sorry, I disagree a little bit. If we want literally to jam the secret > service's attempts to decrypt mails, then it makes sense to use encryption > for every single mail, private, business, nonsense and spam.... > > Technical reasons, NOT to encrypt on a list server are another disussion. > > Best regards > Matthias > -- > Matthias Mansfeld Elektronik * Leiterplattenlayout > Neithardtstr. 3, 85540 Haar; Tel.: 089/4620 093-7, Fax: -8 > Internet: http://www.mansfeld-elektronik.de > GPG http://www.mansfeld-elektronik.de/gnupgkey/mansfeld.asc > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
