On 10/29/2014 at 3:22 PM, "Robert J. Hansen" <r...@sixdemonbag.org> wrote: > >> Why is brute force even mentioned in something about RSA? You >> couldn't brute-force a 128 bit RSA key. I'd say 2048 bit quite >> covers it 8-)
----- Surely Peter knows this too ;-) More likely 128 was a typo for the more common older RSA key of 1028 ... vedaal _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
