On 26/10/14 16:19, Hauke Laging wrote: > The statement "that you are about to encrypt to that key" does not make > much sense if (like in this case) the "you" is a Tor connection.
I don't see why this should be so easily dismissed. It's leaked metadata. And combined with other sources it can provide more information. And I never assumed parcimonie was used to do the keyserver query when I wrote that statement, because you suggested including it in GnuPG. Hence my confusion. Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
