In message <5440e5b8.4090...@digitalbrains.com>, 
Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com> wrote:

>On 17/10/14 01:44, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> In your reply, you said, in effect, "Using X is too complicated" and
>> you suggested no other alternatives.
>
>This is simply not true. I had very little information to go on, but I
>did suggest that perhaps full-disk encryption was something

OK.  Yes.   I stand corrected.

However I think that you may understand (now) that from my perspective,
that was not a real alternative.  From where I was/am sitting, it was
almost as if I made a post saying that I needed to protect my money
and you told me to go and buy myself a bank vault.

In any case, I do apologize for my admittedly short-tempered response.
I've been cranky of late, for reasons having nothing to do with either
you or your response, and I'm sorry.


Regards,
rfg

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to