> Ouch, that's really selective quoting you're doing. No, I'm using the same verbiage I did before. Quoting myself:
===== "Hauke, this entire argument is what I meant when I talked about gilding the lily repeatedly. If you can find half a dozen *real users* who are being *really impacted* by this, I'd love to hear about them." ===== A "real user" is not a user that technically exists but has only ever used GnuPG once and is unlikely to do so again; a real user is one who has a significant need for GnuPG and uses it to address these needs. "Really impacted" doesn't mean an impact barely greater than epsilon; it means significant impact. My usage is consistent. If you've chosen to reinterpret my words as "existence" rather than "significance," that's on you; you've dropped my threshold from significance to "it's okay if the user and the impact are completely insignificant, just so long as they exist," which is clearly not what I meant at all. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
