On 12-08-2014 0:08, David Shaw wrote: > Rather than fixing RFC-1991 support, why not go in the other direction > and make it clear that it isn't supported, and won't work?
Why? It would make checking old mail archives more complicated. Further, since a fix only requires a reordering of the sequence in which packets are saved, is it really so difficult to fix it? I'll have a look at it myself when I can find some time. > I did a bunch of work to make --pgp2 work well and interoperate > with PGP 2.x over a decade ago. Even then it was intended as a > stopgap measure until people finally stopped using PGP 2.x. Most people, inclusing me, have stopped using it. However, I still have a lot of mail archives from those days. Removing support would mean I have to start using pgp 2 again to access them. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
