-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 11 August 2014 at 6:18:33 PM, in <mid:53e8fae9.6070...@sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > That said, many are suggesting shifting to larger > keys, and GnuPG will be making such a shift in the > near future. This and the answer below seem slightly contradictory. Or do you mean that a switch to ECC is equivalent to using much bigger keys? > Q: Will GnuPG ever support RSA-3072 or RSA-4096 by > default? A: Probably not. The future is > elliptical-curve cryptography, which will bring a > level of safety comparable to RSA-16384. Every > minute we spend arguing about whether we should change > the defaults to RSA-3072 or more is one minute the > shift to ECC is delayed. Frankly, we think ECC is > a really good idea and we'd like to see it deployed > as soon as humanly possible. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net Editing is a rewording activity -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlPqbPtXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pBU4D/1n4jGF6ZyWrgulG7+LhiaHh0QuoiKXK2Or1 ZT1bxL/Jfn9h6ximkCkFF4Gyt4qhiPUt8v+cHSlYw/QFQgc69AurS6gv/awW5OqR 4UbotMX5IEPR2nyzeIAlE5qT95Jp0UZ3yhHSB3uovIHdPo0mJ/jYeCZt64luNCTF WoFkEi48 =ZQA2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
