On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:49, kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com said:
> Congratulations on the beta release, it is good to see this > development continuing steadily and I can confirm that it is working > rather nicely. Well, LDAP keyserver support has not yet been implemented. But that is minor thing just some hours works. > A trivial issue with this beta release is the naming; which at least > for me gives gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.0-betabeta442 currently :) Ooops. How does that come? My test build shows 2.1.0-beta442 as to be expected. Did you really run just ./configure and make? I just tested it with running ./autogen.sh on the extracted tarball but the error is a different one. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
