On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:42, cwal...@comcast.net said:
> Are you the list owner? Did you put a "subject line block" on this
> list? If so, you should have said so, if not, then the list owner
There are only a few anti-spam measures on all gnupg.org lists and they
have been there for years. Specific procmail fitering is:
:0
* ^Subject:.*=\?ks_c_5601-1987\?
/dev/null
:0
* ^Subject:.*=\?GB2312\?
/dev/null
:0:
* ^Subject: Delivery Status Notification
/dev/null
:0:
* ^From:.*lottery.*
spam
:0
* ^Content-Type:.*multipart/mixed
{
:0 B
* ^Content-Type:.*text/plain;.*Windows-1252
* ^Content-Type:.*application/octet-stream
/dev/null
}
# We don't accept ZIP or EXE file attachments.
:0 BH
* ? scrutmime --match-zip --match-exe --quiet
/dev/null
:0:
* ^Subject:[ ]=\?Windows-1251\?B\?
/dev/null
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: yes
/dev/null
and there is also greylisting and an RBL at the receiving MX.
And my private filtering drops everything which has HTML inside; do I do
not see all posted mails.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
