On 01/02/14 14:13, Martin Paljak wrote: > Too bad I missed. Where did you get with the ECC discussion?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I understand that 2.1 is planned for the end of summer, and that currently there is a wait for all the haggling and standardisation work around ECC (see https://irtf.org/cfrg mailing list), which is close to done, but there's still debate about point compression format. The time frame also coincides with the last (possibly relevant / possibly FUD) ECC patents expiring. Cheers, arne -- Arne Renkema-Padmos Doctoral researcher CASED, TU Darmstadt @hcisec, secuso.org _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
