> I agree with Robert, you're trying to solve a social problem with a technical > solution.
More to the point, he's solving the wrong problem and conflating policy with mechanism. GnuPG does not provide policy. Policy is the responsibility of the people using GnuPG. All GnuPG provides is mechanism. Your problem can be solved trivially by establishing a policy of, "Encrypted messages must contain a notification within the signed message body of who the message is encrypted for." For many users this sort of policy is a good idea. For the majority of users it's overkill. Why do you want a policy decision to be permanently enshrined in GnuPG's mechanism? _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
