Am Di 17.12.2013, 10:40:21 schrieb Doug Barton: > On 12/17/2013 01:09 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > | Is it possible to synchronize UID list without transferring "new" > > version > > | of private key from B to A by external means? > > No.
I can reproduce the problem but it doesn't make any sense to me. Why are UIDs stored in the secring...? But it is possible to sync pubring and secring (i.e. the answer to the OP's question is yes, not no; whether it's fun...): mkdir split-pub split-sec cp public.gpg split-pub cp secret.gpg split-sec cd split-pub gpgsplit public.gpg # looks like this: 000001-006.public_key 000002-013.user_id 000003-002.sig 000004-013.user_id 000005-002.sig public.gpg cd ../split-sec gpgsplit secret.gpg # looks like this: 000001-005.secret_key 000002-013.user_id 000003-002.sig secret.gpg cp ../split-pub/000004-013.user_id ../split-pub/000005-002.sig . cat 00000* >secret.split.gpg gpg --delete-secret-key 0x12345678 gpg --import secret.split.gpg Hauke -- Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/ http://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
