-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/17/2013 03:01 PM, Micah Lee wrote: |> I hesitate to pay the highwaymen. | Yeah... | | The problem is you're wanting to make GnuPG go mainstream but then you | end up with people seeing this:http://i.imgur.com/53nvUqm.png
+1 I've made the same point before, at least once. I hate to repeat myself, but a real SSL cert really is the way to go here. CAcert is charming and all, but we do not want to encourage people to click past the "untrusted" warning, and there is more than ample evidence that users generally, particularly users who are new to cryptography, lack the requisite knowledge to make good decisions about if/when to do so. I have no connection to StartSSL other than "satisfied non-paying 'customer'" but they do the trick, and the price is right. There are other free options as well, as was pointed out here recently. It doesn't matter to me which one y'all choose, but please, choose one and let's move on. Doug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSsOfbAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEvQoIAIpJiIIIGpESo8LAevjbc4Ml I7YjQclJ0+OWaZmwKmzpTTzKRM9q/Z0TV9bYV9vRTOMiQL1GwTpVMQ7hE1pHgwQ/ Vsw0fy+HkX6F+RPyc1XFxuHtiBPr1kcVSz508PgfCQjzdmozsbdRHDwvhd+vQZKX vHbTBotobiRH9f8qrA5fimmeuUxQT2E0Ha5XMWTXmgTdb9xj3QvKP5pDCnTcT6kh sIZk4CqIOLpCqaJ1dbTUa9LlpCcOUsPSMF33DSVQMxg1l8AP6I5DE/pQmzwYiKvR qNBc6mbS+/9ZfhTumQXg3FOJ8ksj4+DHhMWKX0pV8O9BmmSbTaiI2B+ZXNvnxrM= =UPRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
