Werner Koch: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:37, adrela...@riseup.net said: > >> [This was originally planed as an open letter, but I thought it might >> be better to hear your arguments beforehand.] > > May I suggest to read the archives of just a few weeks to collect the > reasons why suggestions of using SHA-512 are missing the point.
I'll do. > Some > folks here must have bleeding fingertips from repeating the arguments > over and over. I apologize if I haven't searched thoroughly enough in past and have missed the thread suggesting to crank up the default. I can imagine that running a project as this requires nerves of steel. > Having said this, I like to appreciate that you have such a trust in us > GnuPG hackers in that our coding practice and development environment is > bug free at a level that only cracking algorithms is the danger to your > data. I think Adi Shamir was it who said: "Nobody breaks crypto > algorithms; they work around the crypto". _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
