Charly Avital wrote: > > kendrick eastes wrote on 11/10/13, 3:17 AM: > > might be better received at a cryptography based mailing list, also, do > > you plan on releasing source? > > > > > > apologies if this double sends, I've been having network issues recently. > > The source belongs to the company whose web site figures in the link I sent.
No source = Don't use. Companies have their own commercial interests, can die & be bought, can be leaned on by their home nation state, plus states can spy, emit trojans, & want to weaken cryptography/ security. > I have no connection whatsoever with that company, I was just asking the > GnuPG-users list for an opinion. > > Sorry for the misunderstanding. > Charly Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. Extradite NSA spy chief Alexander. http://berklix.eu/jhs/blog/2013_10_30 _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
