-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 28 October 2013 at 8:51:30 AM, in <mid:526e2592.vizyzhweghmqqhhk%st...@privatdemail.net>, Stan Tobias wrote: > I say it does not, because basing one's certification > on that of the notary is not [the same as] basing one's > certification on the notary's verification efforts. What evidence of the Notary's verification efforts do you review? From my reading of this thread, there is only the _assumption_ that sufficient identity checks were properly carried out before the individual started working in a role that carried a corporate email address. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Beware the deadly donkey falling slowly from the sky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlJzx6xXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pNUIEAMUYiECVOqbZkNqNvc7ql6Dqr0rELL7wSPuV pyeKoV7DVmQwZJBcAfCXOS9JFh1vf9f+ziX+1UjmPWezdyF2Rm5tH3hDnhx3wC4V ieGqimLOP5BllF/E/Yy5XQrw6wwqZzgTQ+tRfXGKc3qJMCd4KUNmkf8uRqa7Bzp/ 57Ih7mWL =s1Md -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
