On 13-10-10 02:02 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > your key 0x9771109462F2B970 appears to be an OpenPGPv4 key, not an > OpenPGPv3 key, so i'm not sure what the person you were talking to was > talking about.
Ahh. Interesting. I will point that out to him. > that said, 0x9771109462F2B970 claims to have been generated on > 1998-02-16, and is a 1024-bit DSA key. This is a weak key by today's > standards, and the fact that it has been in use for over 15 years makes > me think that you should probably generate a new primary key anyway. Yeah. I have considered both of those things also. I guess the only thing that was holding me back was that the existing key has an investment in signatures on it though. What I am unclear about is how the authenticity and trustibility of my new key will be regarded in relation to the existing key with all of the signatures on it. Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
