On 09/10/2013 11:10 AM, Josef Schneider wrote: > Why? Assuming the Keys are not related (e.g. by creating random keys > and then encrypting them both with RSA) this is safer, assuming the > attacker can crack one of the two symmetric ciphers but not RSA.
I repeat my earlier message: > If you look in the list archives you can find some pretty long, > detailed writeups on why. It takes you about thirty seconds to type a message. To fully answer your question would require me to spend about an hour crafting an answer. Since your question has been answered *at length* in the archives, I'm not going to answer your question. I'm going to refer you to the archives and save myself an hour. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
