Thanks for the answers.

If an attacker would modify the archive on
the gnupg.org server, he would also need to change
the independent archives like gmane etc.  I pretty sure
this will be spotted relatively soon.

I did a google search for the subject of your email, in which you announced the new version, i.e. for "[Announce] GnuPg 2.0.20 released" (without quotation marks) and got 4 results:

http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2013q2/000328.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2013-05/msg00004.html
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.devel/17871
http://browse.feedreader.com/c/GnuPG_org/420068682

I agree with you, that its unlikely an attacker tampers them all, - still, its just 4 webpages...

I think next to the download link of a gnupg version on gnupg.org you should also note the subject of the email, in which this version was announced, so people can search for it more easily. Such a notice could also be added to
http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html .
What do you think?


Oh and well the attacker would also need to tell you why the
signature of the mail does not anymore check out.
In any case we don't rely on the checksums but on the OpenPGP signatures

I'm thinking of someone how uses windows and wants to install gnupg for the first time. How can he/she rely on OpenPGP? I would have to check the signature with the (possibly tampered) gnupg version he just downloaded. I'm afraid such a person needs to rely on the SHA1 sum and the only thing he can do is to compare his SHA1 sum with as many sources as possible. Which other sources are there? Does the C't publish SHA1 codes? Is it perhaps a good idea to first download an older version of gnupg for which more sources are available?

I still have to check whether there are enough sources for windows users. Do you know some? I will talk about the windows operating system in my gpg4win thread soon.

Thanks again,
Jan

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to