On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote:
> Am 23.07.2013 21:04, schrieb Heinz Diehl: > > On 23.07.2013, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > > > >> Of course it is annoying to have to ask everyone to sign three keys - > >> after all they are all my keys, and the people I ask to sign my key all > >> get to see the same passport. Is there a better alternative? > > > > Create/use one key, and add all the different addresses. > > > >> I do not consider my university computer safe enough to trust it with > >> the private key for my private mail. > > > > In this case, why should anybody else trust in the integrity of your > > identity? If you don't trust this machine, revoke the key and don't do > > anything confidential on/with it. > > > > > > That's not a practical solution. I want to be able to read encrypted > mail sent to my university addresses on that machine. > > Philipp > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > Sounds like you might want an offline master key with a couple UIDs and several subkeys. Also if I didn't trust a system enough to use any secret key on it I probably also would not want to expose decrypted messages to that system, presuming the messages you receive have sensitive/important information in them. Something to consider if you really have cause to not trust that computer might be setting up a dedicated, air-gapped system for encryption/decryption. -- Max Parmer 5D99 D929 93FE EE79 1645 D77A D771 E875 20CB D918
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
