-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/07/2013 03:49 PM, Hauke Laging wrote: | Am Fr 07.06.2013, 13:22:04 schrieb Doug Barton: | |> Personally I have used this strategy and it |> has worked well for me. | |> OTOH, others on this list, and many keys that I have signed over the |> years, have combined various roles (i.e., personal and work e-mail |> addresses) on the same key, so that practice is not uncommon. | | The interesting point is: Has it worked well for them, too? Or was just the | pain of retiring the key (to separate the roles later) too heavy? ;-)
I can't speak for all of them of course, but I have dealt with a non-zero amount of frustration on the part of some of those keyholders after a signing party when old e-mail addresses that were supposed to be working no longer are, etc. For myself, I'm certainly glad that I created 2 separate keys. | Meanwhile I am convinced that most OpenPGP users don't think a lot about what | their key should look like before they generate / publish it. Right-O, so kudos to the OP for doing so. Doug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRsn0jAAoJEFzGhvEaGryEXd8H/2W4VpIAuUrjeN4sCnt4zb8S Nz91s5nKyFb6u+GTgGBXQ5gBxAXg1GAyf9RlJYnNvMjRS3C6AUxb+Hlk2r+vSGlD eKUNVtUNjwKzcBMWljTwWfqPv1T3/HX4gt7uMPk6drK+09QFh3zkm/bewsy66t/D +0V3WZ1SvHXu7VHVV3dVy17EnYdnl3QUOtvc2A0wkYYdQSN8Sv0AaeNPRdxQ2qCx 9f0XvoMEwEHcJQVrJIfRkksEoKxkNBcIcR+f2AYGwq2Tg1raTgZUWnYDiWz4EaMd Zvwpxui1So2LkM2s94RqgD+WSrmmFUXCeT4Bnpc5EzXQhWfcGQPXhYw5dz3tdYM= =PPkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
