Nomen Nescio: > Plausible deniability is still something to shoot for, because in the > WORST case, it is plausible/possible/likely you sent the > message, and in the best and average case, you have complete > anonymity. Where as if you use a medium without plausible deniability > property, the WORST/AVERAGE case is near certainty, and BEST case is > likely.
That WAS true. In a time before the legislation against terrorism. And IF you had nothing to do with the (ridiculous name, heh?) intelligence. Me thinks the difference is the people never bother to think the concepts all the way. So it can be PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY (PD) with certain organisations which are willing to let go because they are swamped in cases or the particular agent handling your case is quite lazy. But it can also mean it can mean PLAUSIBLE GUILTY (PG). And while PD works only once, PG can go ad infinitum. And don't forget there are some organisations which activate worldwide for which any suspicion means guilty without any respect for the facts. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
