On 10/29/2012 4:43 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/29/2012 02:37 PM, User wrote: >> Just because "you" have decided to cherry pick your definition of the >> English word "free" does not make it more or less so. > > It isn't Robert who is picking the definition, it's the FSF. Arguing > about the definition here isn't going to do anyone any good, since the > policy does not originate here. Please respect the policy of the list > (which I personally disagree with, FWIW). > > Meanwhile, Robert has also suggested some useful avenues where you could > direct your efforts. Please do that, instead of picking fights on topics > that either cannot be changed, or are not productive. > > Doug > He's a troll who couldn't find his way out of a wet paper bag. He brought this up, not me. Or is "Robert" one of your sock puppets? If you want to follow him down the "useful avenues" of la-la land, jump aboard. Me, I already know what the words "free" and "broken" mean. If you let someone confuse you about such a simple topic, what the hell business do you have looking at encryption software anyway? Your everyday terminology is already encrypted in your mind. :)
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
